I also would have went with the pre-production idea of using the Ford Capri gas tank, which rides over the axle and differential housing, Engineering. I was raised to honor and value lives, and to think of the end results.
They overlooked standards and neglected the customer. Cost-benefit analysis was one tool used in the evaluation of safety design decisions accepted by the industry and the NHTSA.
Ford was becoming desperate under pressure from foreign competitors.
Super Stock Magazine found the fit and finish to be "superior" and were impressed with the car overall. Through the period eye would the decision made have been the same today as in ? Business ethics 7th ed. The fixed-barrier standard was seen by the auto industry as a significant increase in test severity.
Ford had an ethical obligation to provide safety for the consumers when Ford found out about the gas tank defect. Senior executives, like Lee Iaccoca should have taken the utilitarianism approach of making an ethical decision of producing the Pinto with the appropriate parts, making it safe.
All Bobcats were restyled with a domed hood and a taller vertical bar grille styled to look like senior Mercury models. The jury award was said to be the largest ever in US product liability and personal injury cases. The administration was pressured by safety advocates Center for Auto Safety as well as the public respose.
The people that lost their lives are what made us think of the solution. Through the period eye it was discovered that the decision today would not be the same as in An internal corporate struggle between two executives on which vehicles to market for the company and keeping up with the foreign competition, resulted in not only financial losses but the loss of human lives due to corporate greed.
During that time the car represented 1. The car tended to erupt in flame in rear-end collisions. These actions tainted there reputation. Had this vehicle been made with the baffle there would have been no issue with the product.
The questions that come about when determining how unethical it all was are:Ford Pinto Executive Summary The Ford Pinto case is a classic example of ethics versus money.
Ford decided to make a decision that was unethical in order to save time and money. The Ford Pinto is a subcompact car that was manufactured and marketed by Ford Motor Company in North America, It was also being forced into action due to the ways in which both the courts and executive branch were limiting the ability of the NHTSA to address systematic auto safety issues.
Ford Pinto Executive Summary Your Name University of Phoenix MGT/ Teacher Date Ford Pinto Executive Summary The Ford Pinto case is a classic example of ethics versus money. Ford decided to make a decision that was unethical in order to save time and money.
The questions that come about when determining how unethical it all [ ]. Running head: CASE STUDY PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 CASE STUDY AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2 Ford Pinto Case Study and Executive SummaryMgmt. Executive Summary: Ford Pinto – Business and Social Responsibility Fords’ decision to move ahead with manufacturing the Ford Pinto was financially and ethically erroneous from the start.
Under Lee Iacocca’s direction Ford rushed to market with a flawed business model, incomplete production strategy and questionable engineering approach. Due to the lack of checks and balances and a no.
Ethics Ford Pinto Case Study Discussion and Executive Summary This paper explores “The Ford Pinto Case” managing of business ethics. Numerous factors suggest within this research that Ford Motor Company was negligent and violated its code of ethics%(26).Download